|
|
|
|
Minutes of the 6th
Conference of European Rarities Committees 26
- 30 September 2001 on Hel Peninsula, Poland Sponsored by Carl Zeiss Sports Optics Division ParticipantsAERC:
Tom Conzemius, Gabor Magyar, Marnix Vandegehuchte; Belarus: Alexandre E.
Vintchevski; Belgium: Gunter De Smet, René‑Marie Lafontaine; Cyprus:
Jeff Gordon; Czech Republic: Martin Vavrik; Denmark: Troels Eske Ortvad;
Finland: Annika Forsten, Antero Lindholm, Visa Rauste; France: Philippe
Dubois, Marc Duquet; Germany: Christine Barthel, Peter H. Barthel; Great
Britain: Tony Marr, Andy Stoddart; Hungary: Janos Olah jr., András Schmidt;
Italy: Andrea Corso, Ottavio Janni; Lithuania: Zydrunas Preiksa; Luxembourg:
Patric Lorgé; Poland: Jan Lontkowski, Przemek Chylarecki, Tadeusz Stawarczyk;
Romania: Janos Botond Kiss, Laszlo Szabo, Spain: Ricard Gutiérrez; Ukraine:
Igor Gorban, Oleksandr Ruchko; Sweden: Per Alström (lecturer), Christian
Cederroth, Cecilia Johansson; Switzerland: Lionel Maumary Format
Delegates
arrived at the Pelican Hotel in Jurata, Hel Peninsula, by Wednesday evening 26
September. Thursday all day and Saturday all day were taken up by indoor
conference sessions; Friday was a field day birding around the Gulf of Gdansk;
and Friday and Saturday evenings included presentations by Per Alström on
identification of flava and alba wagtails
from his forthcoming book (expected in 2002). Delegates left for home after
breakfast on Sunday morning 30th. The
organisation was excellently handled by Polish representatives Jan Lontkowski
and Tadeusz Stawarczyk. AERC
Home-page
http://www.birding.yucom.be/AERC/
or http://mypage.org/AERC e-mail
AERC@yucom.be The
AERC Website is the link between AERC and birdwatchers. Its main aim is the
promotion of submitting records to the national Rarities Committees. The
information on the AERC Homepage enables every birder travelling in Europe to
have instant access to addresses of national Rarities Committees and national
lists of birds to be reported. There was a lengthy discussion on the
effectiveness of the website, and agreement that more stimulating pages were
needed to get the website more widely known within the birding community. The
following topics will be included on our homepage:
A
promotion campaign should be started via the european mailing lists and
journals. EUROPEAN
LIST
The
complete list including data of all countries will be published on the AERC
homepage by december 31st 2001. The list will be available via a database with
search functions. There
followed a long discussion about which systematic should be used for the
European List. Three options were proposed: staying with Voous, adopting the
Sibley, Ahlquist & Monroe systematics or using
state of the art systematics based on Wetmore and all published DNA
studies up to 31.12.2001 (Checklist of
the Birds of Europe proposed by Andreas Helbig, presented at the meeting).
No agreement could be found, as several countries opted for stability
whereas others prefer to adopt the new scientific evidence now at the turn of
the millennium. The decision was made to pass the Helbig list to the TAC and
to ask for their advice. The conclusions were that it was far too early to
reach agreement on the Helbig List there and then, but important to await
formal publication, peer review and the opinions of the various national
taxonomic committees in due course. AERC Guidelines
Already
before the meeting a discussion
about the different handling of category
D and E by several European countries started on the AERC mailing list. In the
AERC guidelines the definition of category D and E are as follows: D - every other
species unless it is almost certainly a genuine vagrant (in which case it
enters Cat. A), or almost certainly an escape from captivity (Cat. E). E - escapes from
captivity Category D should
always be published in the annual report, even if it is not a part of the
national list. Category E should be kept on file and published to help other
European countries to evaluate the possibilities of escapes. It
is obvious that different countries are using these categories in a different
way. The
delegates agreed on the following approach to category D and E:
SYSTEMATICS
AND TAXONOMY
The
Conference considered a Report from its four-member TAC dated September 2001.
This included a list of some 13 species splits released on the AERC website
since the formation of the TAC in 1997. No
member of the TAC was present. Delegates
expressed disappointment at the slow rate of progress in the four years
since the TAC=s
formation, pointing out that most of the splits listed had been made several
years ago, with very few agreed since the last Conference two years ago. This
was not helping the various rarities committees in the preparation and
maintenance of their national lists, when they turned to the AERC for advice. It
had been apparent for some time that the TAC had been established without
terms of reference, programme, reporting procedures or accountability, the
absence of which were considered to have contributed to the current
unsatisfactory situation. A joint BOURC/BBRC proposal of measures to overcome
these problems was discussed in detail. The
following Terms of Reference for the TAC were agreed, to take effect
immediately:
Gunter
De Smet (Belgium) was elected as TAC Chairman by a considerable majority. The
members of the TAC appointed by their national Record Committee are:
The
following points were also agreed:
The
Redpoll problem Several
countries were not happy with the split of the Redpoll complex into C.flammea
and C.cabaret. New, unpublished
scientific evidence from Poland, Switzerland, Finland and Sweden should be
added to the Redpoll file for reconsideration by the TAC. A Taxon List: Species or formThere
was a spirited discussion, led by Ricard Gutiérrez (Spain) on the merits of
creating European and national bird lists using either species and subspecies,
or forms or taxa. Opinions were divided. A view expressed was that the AERC
should be the link between science and birdwatchers, and thus any list which
includes forms which are both recognisable in the field and scientifically
accepted should be encouraged. References
were made to the subspecies shown in The
Handbook of British Birds and the forms listed by Birding
World. No final conclusions
were reached, but several countries (Spain, France, Italy, Switzerland and Great
Britain) will try to compile such a Taxon-list. The main aim of such a list
would be to raise awareness of certain taxa, considered as subspecies so far,
but being of considerable interest both for science an conservation.
Birdwatchers (and scientists) should pay more attention to any identifiable form
and collect information already before a taxon is split and upgraded to specific
status. Swedish
Bird Reporting System
Christian
Cederroth gave a presentation describing a remarkable new computerised national
bird reporting and recording system now operational in Sweden. Birders send in
their observations by computer, or even via their rare bird alert system, to a
website where the records appear under species in a list by place, date, time
and observer, linked to maps on various scales which give the location of the
records. The
web address is: http://svalan.environ.se/rappsyst/index.htm Digiscoping
Rarities Committee’s members should be aware that nowadays it is extremely easy to fake digital pictures. This was demonstrated by Ricard who created within seconds several new subspecies of Yellow Wagtail never observed in the field but perhaps submitted to a Rarities Committee in a near future. Next
meeting
Agreed
to be in Romania in September 2003. |
|